Collecting lies, promises, unanswered questions, misleading

Lol! Nice work.

Yes, I can see how this would be offensive. It is, however, only placeholder text and images and the mechanic wouldn't appear in the final game like that. We merely wanted to provide an example of the kind of trade-offs you'd have to make as part of Commandments as a morality system.

Our senior producer, Jemma, would ensure any such offending material were revised and re-worked prior to public consumption. As it is, the slides are from a work-in-progress Powerpoint deck and don't reflect in-game features and functions.

In fact, Jack literally just stuck his head round to say that this has all been re-worked anyway now. Once the Settlements update is out the way, I'll go grab him for more details.

Until the middleware vendor changes the thing you have worked around

Ugh. Nowhere in the Kickstarter was it stated that 22cans would be developing fixes for middle-ware issues. I demand a refund!!! </sarcasm> 

next big lie :     Naming Things

Actually, you CAN name settlements and followers...

Well, unfortunately I think this isn't quite so much a fallacy than just a misspoken use of the term, since the term is somewhat often used loosely [in product distribution] to simply mean "first" - despite what the dictionary says - that's probably just what they'll claim they meant. It's yet another vague term open to interpretation, and to assume it means it would never come to other platforms (which would be kind of silly, really) is just a misunderstanding. Kind of like how they use "Soon" and Beta". Had they said it was coming to the PC exclusively only ever, that would be a different story. Nitpick all you want, it just won't hold up as a valid argument against anything. That's just the hard reality of it.

Be glad they didn't mean "exclusive" as in "a limited time", which is another way I see it used often when referring to a product distribution campaign.

Trying to pick apart everything they say and hold it against them, no matter how vague, and looking for lies and conspiracies is only going to result in driving yourselves nuts. It's not worth it.

Pete and Jack said quite categorically that Godus was FIRST a desktop game, mobile in their own words was 'an addition to the desktop version'.
www.kickstarter.com/projects/22cans/project-godus/posts/358017

So does anyone think it's appropriate to add something about the revision numbering confusions? How even the opt-in doesn't seem to follow very standard methods? Also, can someone check and verify the actual in-game version numbers - for both public release and opt-in?