Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 30, 2015 18:35:44 GMT
Okay then, it looks like those who like Godus are allowed to make comments about those who don't, while any explanation for our reasoning and how we actually feel (as a defence against that kind of portrayal) is rushed off to a rubbish thread. "I think everybody by now knows about the problems of Godus and it is very tiring that a few people seem to spend all their spare time complaining about this game again and again, and personally attacking Peter Molyneux. I really don't understand why they still hang around here if they hate it so much. The strange and sad thing is that it seems like they feel like they are fighting for some good cause with their comments. I keep thinking if only they would spend this much energy not bitching against 22cans but on fighting Monsanto or poverty or whatever a lot of constructive things could be done. "
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 30, 2015 19:18:53 GMT
Okay then, it looks like those who like Godus are allowed to make comments about those who don't, while any explanation for our reasoning and how we actually feel (as a defence against that kind of portrayal) is rushed off to a rubbish thread. "I think everybody by now knows about the problems of Godus and it is very tiring that a few people seem to spend all their spare time complaining about this game again and again, and personally attacking Peter Molyneux. I really don't understand why they still hang around here if they hate it so much. The strange and sad thing is that it seems like they feel like they are fighting for some good cause with their comments. I keep thinking if only they would spend this much energy not bitching against 22cans but on fighting Monsanto or poverty or whatever a lot of constructive things could be done. " Well, Mandrake, it's very important to create an environment where sockpuppets can insult the half-dozen active members and PR robots can pump out meaningless fluff while ignoring inconvenient questions. We're building a community here, after all. Almost reminds me of the Steam forums.
|
|
Lord Ba'al
Supreme Deity
Posts: 6,260
Pledge level: Half a Partner
I like: Cats; single malt Scotch; Stargate; Amiga; fried potatoes; retro gaming; cheese; snickers; sticky tape.
I don't like: Dimples in the bottom of scotch bottles; Facebook games masquerading as godgames.
Steam: stonelesscutter
GOG: stonelesscutter
|
Post by Lord Ba'al on Jul 30, 2015 19:21:17 GMT
Whatever.
|
|
|
Post by Deth on Jul 30, 2015 19:35:35 GMT
Mandrake and petermolyneux I can not not disagree with you more. This board is very fair and if someone who likes the game, as mind boggling and few and far between as that may be. They should be allowed to come here and post with out fear of attack. I am not saying either of you have done this. I for one do think the boards are starting to get a little toxic like I have seen the steam boards get and that does not make me happy. At one time i feel we had a very balanced, if negative, community that did discuss issues. Now I feel it is just Bla bla bla f**k this bla bla bla F**k that and it is not a discussion any more. I can see where Lord Ba'al is coming from as the forums are just spiraling down in a death spiral of blam 22cans they can do no right. I think they could come out and refund every one, create the game they promised and people around here would be "It's a LIE! They came by my house and spiked my water with a hallucinogen! They are transferring a worm to my bank account to drain it and a virus is hidden in the game to delete all my other games!"
|
|
|
Post by Qetesh on Jul 30, 2015 19:37:33 GMT
You have plenty of threads where you can say as you please. You cannot take over all of them. I made that thread for a positive outlet for non members and it is not to be filled with more negative comments.
If you want to cry how bias it is, feel free. Everyone should know that is false. We are just being fair. We don't want a hate forum so this means positive has equal rights. If we had 100 fanboy threads or 100 hater threads, either would be need to be balanced.
I get it your pissed, so I am, I lost 100 pounds and spents hundreds of hours as a tester, but people have a right to be positive and not be faced with a argument about why they should not. You want to do so there are large clearly visible threads to do so in. Me and Ba'al have not had to do much moderation in the past, but we will if is necessary for enjoyment of posters We are not just about Godus anymore, we are a gaming community.
TL;DR We are neither a fanboy or hater forum, we are fair. If you post an OT comment in a thread to sway a conversation or flood boards with multiple threads of same content, you can expect it to be moved.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 30, 2015 19:52:16 GMT
You have plenty of threads where you can say as you please. You cannot take over all of them. I made that thread for a positive outlet for non members and it is not to be filled with more negative comments. Except that I wasn't being negative, I was explaining how some of those apparently targeted by the negative comments I responded to really felt, to put it into better context that we're not just HATE HATE HATE - and that we might actually like parts of the game as well. Not really hate, more disappointment and exasperation. As much as it might seem like a "witch hunt" there are things that 22cans does that aren't cool that are noted, such as the silliness with the Steam forums. If they don't do that...then would we bitch about it? I don't think so.So to address Deth post, I do agree that some of the posts made in exasperation should be curtailed, as per my post in the Combat, but from what I've seen there is almost always details about what could be improved alongside criticism. I don't get this, what about discussion? I will admit that my frustrations did get the better of me on the feedback about Combat, prompting this split thread, but I don't think "hater threads" and "fanboy threads" need to be split in such a way. People should be free to say what they like and don't like without being personally attacked or subject to blanket attacks as was issued in that post.* What? This is about someone making a post which was in part ATTACKING CRITICS and then one of them calmly, with detail, explaining why they feel the way they do. Nothing more. * - Versus having their professional performance critiqued, there is quite a difference.
|
|
Lord Ba'al
Supreme Deity
Posts: 6,260
Pledge level: Half a Partner
I like: Cats; single malt Scotch; Stargate; Amiga; fried potatoes; retro gaming; cheese; snickers; sticky tape.
I don't like: Dimples in the bottom of scotch bottles; Facebook games masquerading as godgames.
Steam: stonelesscutter
GOG: stonelesscutter
|
Post by Lord Ba'al on Jul 30, 2015 19:56:29 GMT
That person was not attacking critics. He was explaining his motivations for not feeling welcome.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 30, 2015 19:57:58 GMT
That person was not attacking critics. He was explaining his motivations for not feeling welcome. I fail to see how Starving Children in Africa has anything to do with her motivations for not feeling welcome.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 30, 2015 20:03:01 GMT
That person was not attacking critics. He was explaining his motivations for not feeling welcome. If that's your opinion i am out of this forum. I know you don't care, me too.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 30, 2015 20:06:50 GMT
Mandrake and petermolyneux I can not not disagree with you more. This board is very fair and if someone who likes the game, as mind boggling and few and far between as that may be. They should be allowed to come here and post with out fear of attack. I don't think anyone's done that. As a matter of fact, the last time this subject came up was when Dave banned a bunch of people over at the Steam forum for attempting to explain their feelings on the game to a "positive" newcomer who felt obliged to insult them. Same thing seems to be happening in the "positive" thread, where the "positive" post in question contained this: "I think everybody by now knows about the problems of Godus and it is very tiring that a few people seem to spend all their spare time complaining about this game again and again, and personally attacking Peter Molyneux. I really don't understand why they still hang around here if they hate it so much. The strange and sad thing is that it seems like they feel like they are fighting for some good cause with their comments. I keep thinking if only they would spend this much energy not bitching against 22cans but on fighting Monsanto or poverty or whatever a lot of constructive things could be done Oh, it's the "Everybody's just calling 22Cans names and isn't giving them a chance and will never be satisfied" narrative again. Strange thing is, I seem to distinctly remember myself, Mandrake, morsealworth, and a number of other people continually giving constructive feedback and pointing out ways 22Cans could rebuild community trust without spending a dime for the past days/weeks/months/years, and the only mention of "F**k this F** that" coming from strawmen certain people made up to pretend otherwise. I'll reiterate that. Pretending that the community will never be satisfied or that 22Cans is in some way being unfairly persecuted is a notion that smacks of intellectual dishonesty. Qetesh Do a headcount of the active forum members and get back to me on that "gaming community" if we're going to go around that circle.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 30, 2015 20:09:37 GMT
That person was not attacking critics. He was explaining his motivations for not feeling welcome. If that's your opinion i am out of this forum. I know you don't care, me too. Let's see, that's one person who quit because of moderation, two people who quit because of 22Cans' toxic nature, I'm starting to sense a pattern here.
|
|
Lord Ba'al
Supreme Deity
Posts: 6,260
Pledge level: Half a Partner
I like: Cats; single malt Scotch; Stargate; Amiga; fried potatoes; retro gaming; cheese; snickers; sticky tape.
I don't like: Dimples in the bottom of scotch bottles; Facebook games masquerading as godgames.
Steam: stonelesscutter
GOG: stonelesscutter
|
Post by Lord Ba'al on Jul 30, 2015 20:11:04 GMT
Qetesh Do a headcount of the active forum members and get back to me on that "gaming community" if we're going to go around that circle. What is that supposed to mean?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 30, 2015 20:15:30 GMT
Oh, it's the "Everybody's just calling 22Cans names and isn't giving them a chance and will never be satisfied" narrative again. Strange thing is, I seem to distinctly remember myself, Mandrake, morsealworth, and a number of other people continually giving constructive feedback and pointing out ways 22Cans could rebuild community trust without spending a dime for the past days/weeks/months/years, and the only mention of "F**k this F** that" coming from strawmen certain people made up to pretend otherwise. I'll reiterate that. Pretending that the community will never be satisfied or that 22Cans is in some way being unfairly persecuted is a notion that smacks of intellectual dishonesty. I'm starting to get the feeling that some folks don't want anything of what has been suggested for improvements to happen, suggested because of the problems we keep returning to because they keep happening repeatedly, and just want to see blind hate. And it isn't just 22cans.
|
|
Lord Ba'al
Supreme Deity
Posts: 6,260
Pledge level: Half a Partner
I like: Cats; single malt Scotch; Stargate; Amiga; fried potatoes; retro gaming; cheese; snickers; sticky tape.
I don't like: Dimples in the bottom of scotch bottles; Facebook games masquerading as godgames.
Steam: stonelesscutter
GOG: stonelesscutter
|
Post by Lord Ba'al on Jul 30, 2015 20:18:36 GMT
Okay then, it looks like those who like Godus are allowed to make comments about those who don't, while any explanation for our reasoning and how we actually feel (as a defence against that kind of portrayal) is rushed off to a rubbish thread. "I think everybody by now knows about the problems of Godus and it is very tiring that a few people seem to spend all their spare time complaining about this game again and again, and personally attacking Peter Molyneux. I really don't understand why they still hang around here if they hate it so much. The strange and sad thing is that it seems like they feel like they are fighting for some good cause with their comments. I keep thinking if only they would spend this much energy not bitching against 22cans but on fighting Monsanto or poverty or whatever a lot of constructive things could be done. " See, if you had read Qetesh's opening post in that thread you would have known better not to post this response to it and then @sundance would not have jumped on that band wagon and I wouldn't have had to move those posts over here so that this would not have happened. That person was not attacking critics. He was explaining his motivations for not feeling welcome. If that's your opinion i am out of this forum. I know you don't care, me too. I'm sorry you feel that way @sundance. I always liked you and am sad to see you leave. But I must say I find the way in which you are doing it both strange and surprising.
|
|
|
Post by Qetesh on Jul 30, 2015 20:20:59 GMT
You have plenty of threads where you can say as you please. You cannot take over all of them. I made that thread for a positive outlet for non members and it is not to be filled with more negative comments. Except that I wasn't being negative, I was explaining how some of those apparently targeted by the negative comments I responded to really felt, to put it into better context that we're not just HATE HATE HATE - and that we might actually like parts of the game as well. Not really hate, more disappointment and exasperation. As much as it might seem like a "witch hunt" there are things that 22cans does that aren't cool that are noted, such as the silliness with the Steam forums. If they don't do that...then would we bitch about it? I don't think so.So to address Deth post, I do agree that some of the posts made in exasperation should be curtailed, as per my post in the Combat, but from what I've seen there is almost always details about what could be improved alongside criticism. I don't get this, what about discussion? I will admit that my frustrations did get the better of me on the feedback about Combat, prompting this split thread, but I don't think "hater threads" and "fanboy threads" need to be split in such a way. People should be free to say what they like and don't like without being personally attacked or subject to blanket attacks as was issued in that post.* What? This is about someone making a post which was in part ATTACKING CRITICS and then one of them calmly, with detail, explaining why they feel the way they do. Nothing more. * - Versus having their professional performance critiqued, there is quite a difference. This is a judgement call that Ba'al and I have made for the good of the forum and we do have a problem at current time of our very fair board becoming a hater board. Your desperation has plenty of space here already, it does not belong in a thread I made specifically for the point of making sure positive posters are welcome. I made said thread partly because of all the complaints we are getting from other posters. Sorry to see Sundance go, he is welcome back anytime he wants.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 30, 2015 20:21:42 GMT
Qetesh Do a headcount of the active forum members and get back to me on that "gaming community" if we're going to go around that circle. What is that supposed to mean? There are half a dozen active forums members, maybe a dozen if we stretch the definition of "active" a bit. In the context of that figure, attempting to justify this new attitude by invoking the greater good of the "gaming community" is absurd. There are many general gaming forums across the web. There are many social boards across the web. The inclusion of any similar features does not make this forum a "gaming community" in any relevant way. We can play with semantics and technicalities for the rest of eternity, but that's neither here nor there.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 30, 2015 20:23:56 GMT
See, if you had read Qetesh's opening post in that thread you would have known better not to post this response to it and then @sundance would not have jumped on that band wagon and I wouldn't have had to move those posts over here so that this would not have happened. If folks actually noticed how I was welcoming, explaining how I felt and that some of the critics actually like parts of the game ourselves and want to see it become better, and that we're not going to bite at those who do like the game, then we wouldn't be in this mess. My post explaining how I felt was different than the Starving Children in Africa first offered, which was apparently perfectly fine.
|
|
|
Post by Qetesh on Jul 30, 2015 20:25:32 GMT
Mandrake and petermolyneux I can not not disagree with you more. This board is very fair and if someone who likes the game, as mind boggling and few and far between as that may be. They should be allowed to come here and post with out fear of attack. I don't think anyone's done that. As a matter of fact, the last time this subject came up was when Dave banned a bunch of people over at the Steam forum for attempting to explain their feelings on the game to a "positive" newcomer who felt obliged to insult them. Same thing seems to be happening in the "positive" thread, where the "positive" post in question contained this: "I think everybody by now knows about the problems of Godus and it is very tiring that a few people seem to spend all their spare time complaining about this game again and again, and personally attacking Peter Molyneux. I really don't understand why they still hang around here if they hate it so much. The strange and sad thing is that it seems like they feel like they are fighting for some good cause with their comments. I keep thinking if only they would spend this much energy not bitching against 22cans but on fighting Monsanto or poverty or whatever a lot of constructive things could be done Oh, it's the "Everybody's just calling 22Cans names and isn't giving them a chance and will never be satisfied" narrative again. Strange thing is, I seem to distinctly remember myself, Mandrake, morsealworth, and a number of other people continually giving constructive feedback and pointing out ways 22Cans could rebuild community trust without spending a dime for the past days/weeks/months/years, and the only mention of "F**k this F** that" coming from strawmen certain people made up to pretend otherwise. I'll reiterate that. Pretending that the community will never be satisfied or that 22Cans is in some way being unfairly persecuted is a notion that smacks of intellectual dishonesty. Qetesh Do a headcount of the active forum members and get back to me on that "gaming community" if we're going to go around that circle. I am not going to argue with you about semantics. I could have 3 members today and 200 tomorrow. We have plans for a future for this board outside of just Godus. We are a gaming community and we are pursing that avenue.
|
|
Lord Ba'al
Supreme Deity
Posts: 6,260
Pledge level: Half a Partner
I like: Cats; single malt Scotch; Stargate; Amiga; fried potatoes; retro gaming; cheese; snickers; sticky tape.
I don't like: Dimples in the bottom of scotch bottles; Facebook games masquerading as godgames.
Steam: stonelesscutter
GOG: stonelesscutter
|
Post by Lord Ba'al on Jul 30, 2015 20:28:28 GMT
What is that supposed to mean? There are half a dozen active forums members, maybe a dozen if we stretch the definition of "active" a bit. In the context of that figure, attempting to justify this new attitude by invoking the greater good of the "gaming community" is absurd. There are many general gaming forums across the web. There are many social boards across the web. The inclusion of any similar features does not make this forum a "gaming community" in any relevant way. We can play with semantics and technicalities for the rest of eternity, but that's neither here nor there. I count 48 members online in the past 10 days, 28 of which within the last 24 hours. On top of that, it is not up to you to decide what this forum is and it certainly isn't your personal playground.
|
|
|
Post by mindless on Jul 30, 2015 20:30:12 GMT
That person was not attacking critics. He was explaining his motivations for not feeling welcome. If that's your opinion i am out of this forum. I know you don't care, me too. sorry to see you go, hope you eventually get that refund your looking for
|
|